Legal Opinion

Segal v. Cooper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 8, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered April 28, 2011, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant the motion as to the third and sixth causes of action, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The court properly declined to dismiss plaintiff Segal’s breach of contract claim. It is true that “[a] contract cannot be implied in fact . . . where there is an express contract covering the subject-matter involved” (Miller v Schloss, 218 NY 400, 406-407 [1916] [emphasis ommitted]).…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Miller v. . SchlossNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Colavito v. New York Organ Donor Network, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Wiener v. Lazard Freres & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Brunetti v. MusallamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kaplan, Inc. v. YunDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. Geigtech E. Bay LLC v. Lutron Elecs. Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. NYAHSA Services, Inc., Self-Insurance Trust v. People Care IncorporatedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API