Legal Opinion
Helden v. Laird
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 11, 1969No. 69 Civ. 3433PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MaeMAHON, District Judge.
Stephen W. Helden petitions for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, claiming that his induction into, and present detention in, the United States Army violate his constitutional right to procedural due process. Petitioner alleges that Selective Service Local Board No. 59, in Syracuse, New York, failed to consider all the pertinent information submitted concerning his request for a II-A occupational deferment and refused to reopen his classification despite his presentation of a prima facie case for such a deferment.
It appears that in June 1968,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. BurlichDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Oskar Gruenwald v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- United States v. VincelliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- United States v. WalshDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1968
- United States Ex Rel. Vaccarino v. Officer of DayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Gregory Crawford LavinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Patrick Donald KellyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. MoyerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- United States v. GoodfellowDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- United States v. Joseph Earl GodleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972