Legal Opinion

State Of Washington, Resp v. Nicole A. Sand, App

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 1, 2016No. 73306-1Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 73306-1-1 f^o CD COc i ——<( (consolidated with cr\ -- '— 3a» ""'*' Respondent, No. 73307-9-1) cr i'T'i CD •"'";• -\ I 1 —.r -~ v. z^~ J-"'"~T 23» tr>r+ zs 1*11 -;--. NICOLE A. SAND and UD ^ .._,. *-—i -"r CANDY MATTILA, UNPUBLISHED OPINION O • \ • Appellants. FILED: August 1,2016 Verellen, C.J. -To show that a prosecutor's comments during rebuttal closing argument were prejudicial, a defendant must show a substantial likelihood that the comments affected the jury's verdict. In view of the strong evidence…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. EmeryWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. GreiffWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. LindsayWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. WeberWashington Supreme Court · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API