State Of Washington, Resp v. Nicole A. Sand, App
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 73306-1-1 f^o CD COc i ——<( (consolidated with cr\ -- '— 3a» ""'*' Respondent, No. 73307-9-1) cr i'T'i CD •"'";• -\ I 1 —.r -~ v. z^~ J-"'"~T 23» tr>r+ zs 1*11 -;--. NICOLE A. SAND and UD ^ .._,. *-—i -"r CANDY MATTILA, UNPUBLISHED OPINION O • \ • Appellants. FILED: August 1,2016 Verellen, C.J. -To show that a prosecutor's comments during rebuttal closing argument were prejudicial, a defendant must show a substantial likelihood that the comments affected the jury's verdict. In view of the strong evidence…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. EmeryWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. GreiffWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. LindsayWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. WeberWashington Supreme Court · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.