Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Wood

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1908No. 5,988PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Prom Howard Circuit Court; J. F. Elliott, Judge. Action by George G. Wood and another against the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.

Appellees sued appellant to recover damages for failure to furnish cars for shipment of corn from appellees’ elevators at Windfall City, Curtisville and Nevada, Tipton county, Indiana, and at Hemlock, Howard eounty, Indiana.

The amended complaint, as filed, was in six paragraphs, but the third paragraph was dismissed. The first paragraph of the amended complaint, in substance, alleges that the plaintiffs are owners of large and expensive grain elevators at Windfall City, Curtisville and Nevada, Tipton county, Indiana, and at Hemlock, Howard county, Indiana; that defendant owned and operated…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Shields v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Central & Montgomery Railroad v. Morris & CrawfordTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Musser v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. StickIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Cargar v. FeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Williams v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. First National Bank v. Federal Land BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Farm Cornn v. WardellDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1915
  5. State ex rel. Yost v. Google, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API