Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State Ex Rel. Department of Revenue v. Karras

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1994No. 18306, 18373Published

1ConcurrenceHenderson, Justice

(specially concurring; concurring in result).

Issue 1

Based upon the following rationale and authorities, I specially concur on Issue 1.

SDCL 10-59-11 begins, “Any tax, penalty or interest due from a taxpayer is a lien in favor of the state upon all property and rights to property whether real or personal belonging to the taxpayer ...” I agree with the majority’s interpretation that the sales tax lien attached to the property at the time the tax is due. Thus, every taxpayer who collects a sales tax essentially has a lien against the property of the taxpayer. For Dion’s title to take priority…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rushmore State Bank v. Kurylas, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Taylor v. TrippSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Karras v. State, Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Reid v. GormanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Roblin v. PalmerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API