Legal Opinion

Overbey v. Plan

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 14, 1988No. WCB 86-05492; CA A42980Published

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that her compensation for temporary total disability (TTD) should be determined according to the parties’ “intent at the time of hire,” former OAR 436-60-020(4)(a), because at the time of her injury she was not “regularly employed” and had been employed less than four weeks. Claimant also assigns error to the Board’s finding that she was not entitled to penalties and attorney fees. We affirm.

We review de novo. In October, 1985, claimant had an interview with Tomlinson, one of employer’s supervisors, for an on-call radiology service…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Saiville v. EBI CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. Newkirk v. Curry Good Samaritan CenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API