Legal Opinion · Dissent

Garlichs v. Empire State Building Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1957Published

1Dissent

Froessel, J. (dissenting).

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff was employed as a window cleaner by the Terminal Window Cleaning Company, which had a contract to clean the windows of the Empire State Building, owned, operated and controlled by Empire State Building Corp. (hereinafter called defendant). He had been working as a window cleaner for approximately 20 years, and in the Empire State Building for approximately 6 to 8 years.

Plaintiff worked under the general direction of the assistant custodian of the building, Corbett, who was an employee of defendant,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Koenig v. Patrick Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Caspersen v. La Sala Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Hess v. Bernheimer & Schwartz Pilsener Brewing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Haefeli v. Woodrich Engineering Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Wohlfron v. Brooklyn Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API