Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Davis Jr v. Ticknor

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided August 27, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00762Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION SAMUEL DAVIS, JR., Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:20-CV-762-JD-MGG JEFFREY TICKNOR, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Samuel Davis, Jr., a prisoner without a lawyer, filed an amended complaint alleging seven defendants violated his rights in connection with a Sexual Battery charge filed against him in State court. ECF 6. “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Erickson…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API