Legal Opinion

Meredith v. Schmidt

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 13, 1927PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

— The infirmities in the assignment of the note and mortgage claimed to leave it open to attack by creditors áre tíiáfithe-- -defendant' -Frank, with intent to defraud creditors, made- -the assignment^ and defendant Frankie, “with the like intent, and without paying any consideration therefor whatsoever,-and for the-specific purpose-of-unlawfully aiding and assisting the said defendant' Frank A. Schmidt in placing his property beyond the reach of his creditors in general^ and of this plaintiff in particular,” took and accepted it. Plaintiff recovered judgment against Frank A. Schmidt October…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Millhiser & Co. v. McKinley, Rangeley & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  2. Malcolm Savings Bank v. MehlinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  3. Cottrell v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  4. Gamet & Ogden v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schmidt v. MeredithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API