Legal Opinion

People v. Bradford

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 2010No. A125040PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NEEDHAM, J.

A defendant shoplifts property from a store in a shopping mall and forcibly resists the mall security guards who apprehend him and recover the property. Can the guards be victims of a robbery when they are not the owners of the stolen property and are not directly employed by the store that owned the property? We conclude the answer in this case is yes, because the guards had a special relationship with the store and had the duty and authority to retrieve its stolen property. We also reject defendant’s claims that the jury instructions on this point were defective and that…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. People v. MarsdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. People v. GalvezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. People v. FioreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. People v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  5. People v. BannerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API