Legal Opinion
Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Hafley
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided November 15, 2002No. 03-02-00107-CVPublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIDD, Justice.
This is a worker’s compensation case. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company (“Hartford”) challenges an award of Supplemental Income Benefits made by the Worker’s Compensation Commission (“the Commission”) to Richard A. Hafley (“Hafley”). See Tex. Lab.Code Ann. §§ 408.142, .147(c) (West 1996 & Supp. 2002). In a modified trial de novo, the district court affirmed the award and awarded attorney’s fees to Hafley. See id. §§ 410.251, .252 (West 1996). Hartford argues that: (1) the Commission improperly calculated Hafley’s income from self-employment based on net, rather than gross,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Texas Workers' Compensation Commission v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Dubai Petroleum Co. v. KaziTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Mingus, Receiver v. WadleyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Tarrant Appraisal District v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Argonaut Insurance Co. v. BakerTexas Supreme Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Kshatrya v. Texas Workforce Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
- Texas Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'n v. National American Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
- Scott v. Presidio I.S.D., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
- City of Seabrook v. Port of Houston Authority, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
- Zenith Star Insurance Co. v. Wilkerson, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.