Hannaford Bros. Co. v. State Tax Assessor
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
SCOLNIK, Justice.
This case presents another example of the recurring problem of defining a transaction as a lease or a sale. In this case the State Tax Assessor has assessed a tax on the use of certain vehicles that Hannaford Bros., Co. acquired from the Hertz Corporation. Hannaford argues that the transaction avoids that tax. If the transaction was a sale, Hannaford’s subsequent use of the vehicles was properly taxed under 36 M.R.S.A. § 1861 (1978). 1 If, on the other hand, it was a lease, then the assessment was improper. Despite the parties’ best efforts to label the transaction a “lease”…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In the Matter of Spencer Jerome Tillery, Bankrupt. Bill Swad Leasing Company v. Henry A. Stikes, Sr., TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Rainier National Bank v. Inland MacHinery Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- In Re PeacockUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1980
- In Re Tulsa Port Warehouse Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Transamerica Leasing Corp. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Measurex Systems, Inc. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- In Re Access Equipment, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1986
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Sunday River Skiway Corp. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
- Trucklease Corp. v. Cozy Harbor Seafoods, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000