August Gast Bank Note & Lithographing Co. v. Fennimore Ass'n
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. John M. Wood,- Judge. It is a general rule that an injunction against several defendants jointly implicated in the same transaction willnotbe dissolved until all of the defendants have answered denying the equities of the bill. 1 Beach Injunctions, sec. 323; 2 Spelling Ex. Rem., sec. 1065; 2 High Injunc., sec. 1528; 10 Am. and Eng. Ency. PL and Pr., p. 1078; 10 Am. and Eng.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. John M. Wood,- Judge. It is a general rule that an injunction against several defendants jointly implicated in the same transaction willnotbe dissolved until all of the defendants have answered denying the equities of the bill. 1 Beach Injunctions, sec. 323; 2 Spelling Ex. Rem., sec. 1065; 2 High Injunc., sec. 1528; 10 Am. and Eng. Ency. PL and Pr., p. 1078; 10 Am. and Eng. Ency. of Law, 1017. Although exceptions to this rule are allowed, no exception is allowed the effect of which is to split the proceeding into several parts, only…
1Opinion of the CourtBland, P. J.
On the application of the appellant, and without notice to the defendants, a temporary injunction was awarded by the lower court, Restraining defendants from carrying on a strike against the lithographing business of plaintiff and against the use of violence toward the employees of plaintiff to force them to quit plaintiff’s employment, and prohibiting defendants from using violence toward persons wk .in the plaintiff might employ, to deter such persons from entering its employment. The temporary order was on July 10, 1895, served on the Eennimore Association and on thirty-four individuals,…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Price v. SanditenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- August Gast Bank Note & Lithographing Co. v. Fennimore Association No. 5Missouri Court of Appeals · 1900
- Helmkampf v. WoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1900