Cuer v. Ross
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from tlie Circuit Court for Marathon County. The defendants above named appealed from a judgment in plaintiff’s favor.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from tlie Circuit Court for Marathon County. The defendants above named appealed from a judgment in plaintiff’s favor. The case is thus stated by Mr. Justice Taylor: “This action was commenced in justice’s court against one Peters and the appellants to recover about the sum of $1 35, alleged to be due to the plaintiff from Peters for supplies furnished to him in getting out certain pine logs which the appellants own or have an interest in, and for a judgment declai’ing the plaintiff’s right to a lien upon such logs and timber for -said sum. Peters did not make any appearance or defense…
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
We are of the opinion that the ruling of the circuit court was correct. Both the bills of items furnished by the plaintiff showed that there had been a settlement of the accounts between the plaintiff and the defendant Peters on the 11th day of December, 1877, and that upon such settle*655ment there had been found due the plaintiff the sum of §325.28. This settlement was not denied by the defendants in their answer, nor was there any evidence given on the trial in any way tending to impeach the correctness of the settlement. Peters makes no defense, and the appellants do not on his behalf, either…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Yellow River Improvement Co. v. ArnoldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
- Cooban v. BryantWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Darling v. ConklinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- Jones v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- Otto v. KlauberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gallun v. SeymourWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890