Carter v. State

Melton, Justice.

Following his conviction for malice murder and robbery, Cortez Carter appeals, contending that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict and that the trial court erred by admitting certain DNA evidence. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

1. Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the facts of record show that, on the evening of October 16,2002, a call was placed to Pizza Hut from the apartment where Bjorn Green lived. Green is a friend of Carter’s and is his co-defendant in this matter. The caller ordered a pizza and asked that it be delivered to…