Legal Opinion

Proal v. Camaan

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 1, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

The evidence warranted a finding that the stairs on which the plaintiff was injured were reasonably necessary for the convenient occupancy of the Camaan block and that the tenants used them “for supplies or anything that would naturally come in and out of the back door.” The plaintiff’s employer ran a small restaurant. Just before the accident he had sent the plaintiff to purchase some supplies needed in the kitchen of the restaurant, and the plaintiff was returning by “the most direct route into the kitchen” when she fell. The defendant himself testified that he owned and maintained the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Horn v. DanzigerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ahearn v. RouxSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949
  2. Reek v. LutzSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API