Legal Opinion
Pilipauskas v. Yakel
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided February 4, 1994No. 1-92-3592PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE MURRAY
delivered the opinion of the court:
The defendants, Denver Yakel and Carole Yakel, both individually and d/b/a the Arrow Lodge Resort (Arrow Lodge or Lodge), brought a petition for leave to appeal pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rule 306(a)(l)(iii). (134 Ill. 2d R. 306(a)(l)(iii).) We granted the defendants’ leave to appeal. The defendants appeal from an order of the trial court denying their motion to quash the service had upon them for lack of personal jurisdiction.
The plaintiffs, David, Debra and William Pilipauskas, and Sandra and Matthew Rusek, filed this suit…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Rollins v. EllwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Fmc Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Victoria Varonos, Cross-Appellee v. Continental Illinois National Bank, Garnishee-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Shaw v. LorenzIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Stein v. Rio Parismina LodgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Gaidar v. Tippecanoe Distribution Service, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Zazove v. Pelikan, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Spartan Motors, Inc. v. Lube Power, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Forrester v. Seven Seventeen HB St. Louis Redevelopment Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.