Legal Opinion

Grace v. Repose Mausoleums, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1912PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to continue a temporary injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtPutnam, J.

The Repose Mausoleums, Inc., having been formed as a business corporation with wide and general commercial powers is not, and cannot claim the rights of, a cemetery corporation. “A cemetery for the burial of the dead,” says Mr. Justice Gray, in Close v. Greenwood Cemetery, 107 U. S. 474, “ if not a strictly charitable use, is in some respects a pious and public use,” and this is the view of the legislature. The Rural Cemetery Act (Laws of 1847, chap. 133) authorized not less than seven persons to incorporate with not less than six nor more than twelve trustees. A corporation so formed (§ 4)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Close v. Glenwood CemeterySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Brown v. Maplewood Cemetery Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Briggs v. Bloomingdale Cemetery Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API