Legal Opinion

The Charlotte

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided August 11, 1903PublishedCited by 10 opinions

In Admiralty. Suits to recover damages sustained in collision.

1Opinion of the Court

WADDILL, District Judge.

These libels were filed to recover damages arising from the loss of the lives of the libelants’ intestates, respectively, in a collision between the respondent’s steamship Charlotte and the schooner Annie M. Harris, the causes being heard together by consent of parties, as they depend, so far as the collision is concerned, upon the same state of facts. The Charlotte, an iron screw steam vessel of 1,746 tons register, 1,300 horse power engines, of a speed of some 15 knots per hour, owned by the Chesapeake Steamship Company, of Baltimore City, and plying between the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The UmbriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. The MartelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. The RichmondDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1902
  4. Law v. The TraveDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1893
  5. The PerkiomenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1886

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Baltimore & O. R. v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  2. Oklahoma Union Ry. Co. v. HoukSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Courtney v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
  4. ElwoodDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1947
  5. Miller v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API