Miner v. Medbury
Wisconsin Supreme Court
At a former term of this court, this cause came on for hearing upon an appeal from a final decree of the circuit court of Milwaukee county. The decree of the circuit court was reversed, judgment rendered accordingly, the opinion of the court placed on file, and the cause remitted to the circuit court. Now at this, the succeeding term, two motions are made in the cause, both of which are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Cole, J.
Two motions have been made in this case, which will now he disposed of, — one on the part of the respondent for a rehearing of the cause; the other on the part of the Appellant, for this court to amend the remittitur *101herein by adding a direction to the court below to enter judgment rescinding the contracts in the bill mentioned, and for a judgment in favor of the appellant, and against the respondent, for the money paid on the contracts with interest and costs of suit.
We are of the opinion that both these motions should be denied. In reference to the motion for a…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Du Pont v. DavisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
- Crockett v. GraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- Jordan v. HumphreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- State ex rel. Allen v. Judges of the St. Louis Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
- Tomberlin v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.