Legal Opinion
Layaou v. Xerox Corp.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided March 27, 1998No. 95-CV-6388LPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, John Layaou, commenced this action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. Plaintiff, who was born in 1940, alleges that defendants Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”) and Peter DeMauro, plaintiff’s former supervisor, terminated his employment in January 1994 on account of,his age. Plaintiff also asserts an age discrimination claim under the New York State Human Rights Law (“HRL”), N.Y.Exec. L. § 296. In addition, plaintiff asserts a claim (the legal basis for which is not spelled out in the complaint) alleging…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Chardon v. FernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Phyllis Miller v. Maxwell's International Inc., Dba Maxwell's Plum, Debtor in Possession Carlo Galazzo, Gen. Mgt., Dino La Rosa Don Bohn Don SchupakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation v. Esprit De Corp. And Federated Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Layaou v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Brierly v. Deer Park Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Murphy v. Board of Education of the Rochester City School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2003
- Hines v. Hillside Children's CenterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1999
- Purdy v. Town of GreenburghDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.