Herman v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
HABEAS CORPUS before a judge of the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.
Herman was arrested upon a charge of having violated the liquor act of 1855. He obtained a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant, to which he is now brought before us at chambers, with the cause of his detention in custody.
His counsel moves for his discharge on the ground that said liquor act is unconstitutional and void. The case is submitted to us upon the arguments heretofore filed in the Supreme Court in the case of Bebee.
Ve regret that this question‘has been thus presented to us. "We had hoped that these applications would have been confined'to the inferior courts till the Supreme *546Court had…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Barron Ex Rel. Tiernan v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- Thurlow v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- Satterlee v. MatthewsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Andrews v. RussellIndiana Supreme Court · 1845
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Egly v. Blackford County Department of Public WelfareIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Spurgeon v. RhodesIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Moore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- Jones v. GranthamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Morris v. BrandenburgNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.