Legal Opinion

Holder v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 8, 1930No. 13453PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for possession of mash and equipment for manufacturing intoxicating liquor, punishment being-one year in the penitentiary.

The denial of appellant’s application for continuance was not error. The application fails to show whether process was ever issued for the absent witness, or what became of it if issued. Buie v. State, 1 Tex. Cr. App. 453; Cooper v. State, 7 Tex. Cr. App. 194; Collins v. State, 26 S. W. (2d) 1074; Best v. State, 28 S. W. (2d) 803; Branch’s Ann. Tex. P. C., page 186, Sec. 314.

Officers were searching for a still. Sheriff Hudson approached a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  2. Collins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Best v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Winfrey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Bonner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Leaks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Winfrey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API