Hill v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
In his motion for rehearing appellant takes the position that the grand jury which first indicted him was an illegally constituted grand jury, and that the purported indictment returned against him by that body was in fact no indictment at all; that, therefore, the Act of the 47th Legislature set out in our original opinion has no application to his case and that the present indictment having been returned more than a year after the offense was committed the prosecution is barred under the one year statute of limitation in prosecutions for rape.
As supporting his contention appellant cites…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ogle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
- Juarez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Ex Parte ReynoldsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Stroud v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Riddle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.