Territory of Hawaii v. Wright

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

KEMP, C. J.

This case is before us on defendant’s bill of exceptions. The defendant has abandoned exceptions 1, 3 and 4 and relies upon exceptions 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11, under which he specifies error, as follows:

1. The court erred in sustaining the prosecution’s challenge to juror David Pokini Ellis for cause (Ex. 2) ;

2. The court erred in requiring defendant to give secondary evidence as to his conviction of heedless driving without proof of unavailability of court record or that it could not be produced (Ex. 5) ;

3. The court erred in denying defendant’s motion…