Legal Opinion
People v. Dickens
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 10, 1996PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The grounds defendant now advances for challenging the *1033lawfulness of the search were not presented to the trial court. We therefore conclude that defendant failed to preserve his present claims for this Court’s review.
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
2Cited by11 opinions
- People v. HuntleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. MonahanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. ReddenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.