Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. McFall

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 26, 2003No. SC02-1350PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

863 So.2d 303 (2003)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,

v.

Mark W. McFALL, Respondent.

No. SC02-1350.

Supreme Court of Florida.

November 26, 2003.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, and John Anthony Boggs, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, Florida; and Stephen Christopher Whalen, Assistant Staff Counsel, Tampa, FL, for the Florida Bar, Complainant.

Mark W. McFall, pro se, Piney Flats, TN, for Respondent.

2Per curiam

We have for review a referee's report regarding alleged ethical breaches by Mark W. McFall. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

Pursuant to the Bar's Petition for Emergency Suspension,…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. The Florida Bar v. ShanzerSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  4. The Florida Bar v. TravisSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  5. The Florida Bar v. KoronesSupreme Court of Florida · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by14 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. CommitteSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. The Florida Bar v. BarrettSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  3. The Florida Bar v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  4. The Florida Bar v. Jeremy W. AltersSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
  5. The Florida Bar v. Valentine-MillerSupreme Court of Florida · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API