Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bonarrigo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 23, 1982No. 1262PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was found guilty of speeding 1 at a trial de novo following his conviction before a magistrate. He was sentenced to pay costs and a fine of ninety-five dollars. This appeal followed.

After a review of the record, we are led to the conclusion that this sentence must be vacated and the case remanded to the lower court.

The trial judge found Appellant guilty at the conclusion of the de novo trial and immediately imposed sentence. However, Appellant was not informed of his right to file written posttrial motions, as per Pa.R.Crim.P. 1123. See Commonwealth v. Grey, 298 Pa.Super. 525, 445…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KochSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. NugentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. GreySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. Florida-Eastern U.S. Van Lines, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API