Legal Opinion

Friedman v. BHL Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 14, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered May 11, 2010, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied.

Even in light of the arguments raised and evidence submitted inappropriately for the first time in reply (see Azzopardi v American Blower Corp., 192 AD2d 453, 454 [1993]), defendant failed to meet its burden to show prima facie that plaintiffs cause of action has no merit. In support of its argument that there was no dangerous condition on the exterior…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Azzopardi v. American Blower Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Pomahac v. TrizecHahn 1065 Avenue of the Americas, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Styles v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Seleman v. Barnes & Noble, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Seleman v. Barnes & Noble, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Stolowski v. 234 East 178th Street LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Stolowski v. 234 East 178th Street LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API