Legal Opinion
United States v. Smith
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 23, 1962No. Crim. No. 324-62PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNGDAHL, District Judge.
The motions of defendants Bowden and Smith to suppress certain items of evidence upon the ground that those items were illegally obtained by the police came on to be heard by the Court after the jury had been selected and excused pending the outcome of this hearing. The Court heard two days of testimony, and now makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.
I
Both defendants were arrested on Friday, March 9,1962, at 9:45 p. m., suspected of a purse-snatching not connected with the robbery charged against them in *555the present indictment. The reason the two…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Walter L. Harling v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Maniaci v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- State v. MichaelArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- United States v. CheyenneDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1976
- Wilson M. Smith, Jr. v. United States of America, Raymond Bowden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- Wilson M. Smith, Jr. v. United States of America, Raymond Bowden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963