Legal Opinion

Meeks v. Broschinski

Staunton County Circuit Court

Decided September 25, 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge Humes J. Franklin, Jr.

In the case of Meeks v. Broschinski, Defendant, employee of the City of Staunton, Virginia’s emergency personnel,1 invokes the public duty doctrine as a defense to Plaintiff’s negligence claim against Defendant for his alleged failure to provide emergency medical services to Plaintiff following Defendant’s receipt of a 911 call reporting a suspected hit-and-run accident in Staunton, Virginia, on August 25, 2001. Whether the public duty doctrine shields Defendant from liability is a complicated matter that invokes both legal doctrines and public policy concerns.

Th…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cuffy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Muthukumarana v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Marshall v. WinstonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  4. Dudley v. Offender Aid & Restoration of Richmond, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1991
  5. Linda Lee Corp. v. Covington Co.Bedford County Circuit Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API