Hawkins v. City of Prairie Grove
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Donald L. Corbin, Justice.
We treated appellant’s petition for writ of certiorari, filed pursuant to superseded Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 29(6)(a) as a petition for review under the current Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 1 -2(f), and granted review of the Arkansas Court of Appeals’s decision reported as Hawkins v. City of Prairie Grove, 43 Ark. App. 81, 861 S.W.2d 118 (1993). We granted review under Rule l-2(f) because the appeal requires the interpretation of Ark. Code Ann. § 16-17-213 (Supp. 1991) and should therefore have originally been heard in this court. Upon review, we find no error and affirm.
Appellant,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Whitson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Edwards v. City of ConwaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Ottens v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Bocksnick v. City of LondonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Nowlin v. Merchants National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Johnson v. DawsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- Bell v. Estate of BellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Clark v. Pine Bluff Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- J&M Mobile Homes, Inc. v. HamptonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Lineberry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.