Legal Opinion
Wachter v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 12, 2004No. 2D03-3499PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
868 So.2d 629 (2004)
William WACHTER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D03-3499.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
March 12, 2004.
2Per curiam
William Wachter challenges the order of the trial court denying his postconviction motions filed pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) and 3.850. We affirm without prejudice to any right Wachter might have to file a facially sufficient claim pursuant to rule 3.800(a) alleging that the trial court, in case number 91-1530, illegally imposed consecutive habitual offender sentences for offenses that arose out of a single…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Burgess v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Downs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- West v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Watson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
4Cited by5 opinions
- Harris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Clay v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Compton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Dunn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Louismeme v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006