Legal Opinion

Hill v. Webber

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1883PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Mecosta. (Russell, J.) Beplevin. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, C. J.

This was an action of replevin in which the property was taken on the writ and delivered to the plaintiff. Issue was joined July 23,1881, and the first reg*143miar term thereafter was in October of that year, and the next occurred February 7, 1882. Both sides neglected noticing the cause for trial for said terms respectively, and on the 4th day of February, being three days in advance of the opening of said second term, the attorney for defendants filed his affidavit with the clerk for judgment as in case of non-suit; and at the same time entered the motion in the special motion-book.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Griffith v. MillerNew York Supreme Court · 1832

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hogan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  2. McKenzie v. A. P. Cook Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Standard Finance Corp. v. BrelandMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State Ex Rel. Magnuson v. District Court of First Judicial Dist.Montana Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Abe Stein Co. v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API