Legal Opinion

Gladfelter v. Loiselle

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 1, 1964No. 33407PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

On petitioner’s request, writ of certiorari was granted and oral argument authorized pursuant to Article V, Section 4(2) of the Constitution of Florida, F.S.A. because of a certificate of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, that their decision in Loiselle v. Gladfelter, 160 So.2d 740 “passes upon a question of great public interest.” After further consideration we hold that the opinion of the District Court, supra, properly disposes of the questions of law presented and is approved by this court.

Accordingly the writ of certiorari heretofore entered is discharged.

DREW, C. J., and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Loiselle v. GladfelterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Curbelo v. UllmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. Jayre Inc. v. WACHOVIA BANK & TR. CO.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Ansel v. KizerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Bader Bros. Van Lines, Inc. v. JayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  5. Hall v. MorozewychAlaska Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API