In Re the Marriage of Keedy

*54I concur with those parts of the majority opinion which reverse the District Court’s distribution of appellant’s retirements benefits, and which affirm the District Court’s exclusion of certain assets from the marital estate.

I dissent from that portion of the majority opinion which includes any portion of appellant’s baseball card collection acquired prior to the marriage as a marital asset.

The majority correctly points out that the disposition of property acquired prior to marriage is controlled by § 40-4-202(1), MCA. However, conspicuously absent from the majority opinion are any of our…