In Re the Personal Restraint of Heidari

f 14 (concurring/dissenting) — I agree with the majority that the jury in this instance did not necessarily find every element of attempted second degree child molestation. This was true because the crime charged (molestation of a child) did not require a finding of specific intent. However, the majority has written too broadly. We decide only that a conviction of a lesser crime may not be entered here. In most cases, with different charged crimes, such resolution is available.

¶15 The law in Washington allows an appellate court to direct the entry of judgment for a lesser included offense (1)…