Legal Opinion

Burnham v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1910No. 16,571PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from tbe district court for Lancaster county: Lincoln Frost, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

At Burnham, July 5, 1905, a freight train operated by defendant struck and killed plaintiff’s horse, and this is a suit to recover its value. There were two trials. At the first plaintiff recovered a judgment on the theory that defendant was negligent in failing to fence its track where' the horse entered the right of way. On appeal to this court, the first judgment was reversed because defendant was under no obligation to fence its track at that place. Burnham v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. 83 Neb. 183. Upon a retrial in the district court, plaintiff recovered a judgment for $162.20, the ground…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. VincentNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Omaha & Republican Valley Railway Co. v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Burnham v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Burlington & Missouri River Railroad v. GorsuchNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. VandeventerNebraska Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bauer & Johnson Co. v. National Roofing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Hoomana Naauao O Hawaii ex rel. Maia v. MakekauHawaii Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API