Legal Opinion

United States v. Jeffrey Wayne Aunspaugh

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 8, 2015No. 12-13132PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HINKLE, District Judge:

This is an honest-services fraud case. On one view of the evidence, the defendants participated in a classic kickback scheme. On another view, the scheme involved an egregious conflict of interest but no kickback. Under Skilling v. United States, 561 U.S. 358, 130 S.Ct. 2896, 177 L.Ed.2d 619 (2010), the defendants’ conduct constituted honest-services fraud only on the first view, not the second. Because the jury instructions would have allowed a conviction on either view of the evidence, we vacate the honest-services convictions. We also vacate other convictions that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Skilling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. United States v. RybickiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Zachary BirdCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023
  2. United States v. Matthew ZayasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API