Lisko v. Hicks.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtGrlufiN Smith, C. J.
The chancery court for Arkansas county upheld the contention of Frank Hicks that he had entered into a certain oral contract with John Lisko, Sr. Lisko died a month later and his widow and heirs, denying that the alleged contract had been made,, undertook to avoid its consequences.
The various proceedings leading up to this controversy are somewhat involved, but a review is necessary to an understanding of this appeal.
In 1926, E. W. Crandall loaned $400 to Earle W. Moorehead. To secure his note, Moorehead mortgaged 'all of Block “P” of Crescent Hill Addition to the city of Stuttgart. In 1928,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bland v. TalleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
- Grayson v. BowlinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
- Lasker-Morris Bank & Trust Co. v. GansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- Heaslet v. SpratlinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
- Edlin v. MoserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Harbour v. HarbourSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Campbell, Administrator v. HammondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
- Mortensen v. BallardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
- Harris v. Whitworth, AdministratorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- McKindley v. HumphreySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.