Legal Opinion

Moore v. Deal

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1965No. Civ. A. 26533PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN DUSEN, District Judge.

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment under F.R.Civ.P. 56(b) has been previously before this court. Since the facts involved in this motion are recited in the previous opinion, published in 203 F.Supp. 66 (E.D.Pa.1962), it will not be necessary to recite them again here.

When this matter was previously before the court, the undersigned ruled that defendants’ motion for summary judgment would not be ready for decision until a final judgment was entered in the third-party action in Civil Action No. 24142. Subsequent to the filing of this opinion on defendants’…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Simodejka v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Zampetti v. CavanaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Woods v. RobbCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
  4. Keller v. KeklikianSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  5. Ursula Makariw, Administratrix of the Estate of Eugen Makariw, Deceased v. Ronald C. RinardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. International Organization Masters, Mates & Pilots, Local No. 2 v. International Organization Masters, Mates & Pilots of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Ingersoll-Rand Equipment Corp. v. Transportation InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Reynolds v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  4. In Re WerthUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1984
  5. Weber v. WeberDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API