John Cecil Cabe v. Michael D. Antonovich
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 12 JOHN CECIL CABE, No. 2:23-cv-10422-FWS-BFM 13 Petitioner, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 14 WHY HABEAS PETITION MICHAEL D. ANTONOVICH SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED 15 COURTHOUSE, 16 Respondent. 17 18 This Order concerns a federal habeas petition. Petitioner John Cecil Cabe 19 filed a habeas petition in the Ninth Circuit, which transferred the Petition to 20 the United States District Court. (ECF 1 (“Petition”), 4.) Under Rule 4 of the 21 Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States Ex Rel. Robinson Rancheria Citizens Council v. Borneo, Inc. Clear Lake Indian Bingo Ltd. American Arbitration Association Herman SchnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Erick Arevalo v. Vicki HennessyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Jerry F. Stanley v. California Supreme CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.