Legal Opinion

Town of Elm Grove v. Town of Pekin

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 15, 1940No. Gen. No. 9,232Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fulton

On February 25, 1938, the Town of Elm Grove brought a suit at law against the Town of Pekin, seeking to recover money expended by the Town of Elm Grove in supporting certain paupers who were transferred by the supervisor of the Town of Pekin to the Town of Elm Grove. Both townships are located in the county of Tazewell, Illinois. The suit is based upon the provisions of sec. 16, ch. 107, Ill. Rev. Stat. 1937 [Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 98.18], said chapter being entitled, “Paupers.”

That section provides, in substance, that where a person shall become chargeable as a pauper within 12 months after…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Town of Kankakee v. Kankakee & Indiana RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  2. People Ex Rel. Spence v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Sanderson v. Town of La SalleIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Town of Big Grove v. Town of FoxAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  5. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. People ex rel. WallIllinois Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API