Legal Opinion

C. Thomas Ryther v. KARE 11

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 31, 1996No. 94-3622Published

1Opinion of the Court

___________ No. 94-3622 ___________ C. Thomas Ryther, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. KARE 11, an NBC Affiliate; * Gannett Co., Inc., * * Defendants - Appellants. * ___________ Submitted: June 15, 1995 Filed: May 31, 1996 ___________ Before LOKEN and LAY, Circuit Judges, and VAN SICKLE,* District Judge. ___________ LAY, Circuit Judge. KARE 11, a Twin Cities television station, refused to renew C. Thomas Ryther's contract as lead sportscaster for a fifth three-year term. In 1991, when Ryther was terminated, he was…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API