Legal Opinion

Minard v. Dover, Rockaway & Port Oram Gas Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 24, 1908PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On cerliorari.

1Opinion of the Court

*133The opinion of the court was delivered by

Trenchakd, J.

The defendant, the Dover, Eoekaway and Port Oram Gas Company, was convicted by a justice of the peace of a violation of section 33 of the Pish and Game act, approved April 14th, 1903 [Pamiph. L., p. 534), for allowing infuse from its gas-house in Dover to flow into Eoekaway river.

The prosecutor assigns and argues many reasons for setting aside the conviction, but they may all be resolved into two— first,, that the complaint and summons were not endorsed as is required in suits by common informers under section 219 of our Practice act…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. White v. Mayor of Neptune CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
  2. Preusser v. CassSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sawran v. LennonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API