Legal Opinion

Roosevelt & Son Inv. Fund v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided March 6, 1936No. Docket No. 76196Published

For the years 1927 and 1928 taxpayer filed fiduciary returns on form 1041. Despite a ruling by the Commissioner in 1929 that it was taxable as a corporation, taxpayer on March 15, 1930, again filed a fiduciary return, giving all information requisite for assessing the tax either as a trust or as a corporation.

Read the full summary

For the years 1927 and 1928 taxpayer filed fiduciary returns on form 1041. Despite a ruling by the Commissioner in 1929 that it was taxable as a corporation, taxpayer on March 15, 1930, again filed a fiduciary return, giving all information requisite for assessing the tax either as a trust or as a corporation. On October 17, 1930, the Commissioner advised that on reconsideration it was held that taxpayer was a strict trust for the years 1927 and 1928, and on November 11, 1930, pursuant to request for a further ruling, advised that if the conditions had not changed the same ruling would be…

1Opinion of the Court

ROOSEVELT & SON INVESTMENT FUND, GEORGE E. ROOSEVELT, PHILIP J. ROOSEVELT, FAIRMAN R. DICK, ERMAND J. RIFFLARD AND VAN S. MERLE SMITH, AS MANAGERS, AND CHEMICAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY (FORMERLY THE CHEMICAL NATIONAL BANK OF NEW YORK), AS TRUSTEE, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Roosevelt & Son Inv. Fund v. Commissioner

Docket No. 76196.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

34 B.T.A. 38; 1936 BTA LEXIS 757;

March 6, 1936, Promulgated

For the years 1927 and 1928 taxpayer filed fiduciary returns on form 1041. Despite a ruling by the Commissioner in 1929 that it was taxable as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Zellerbach Paper Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Lucas v. Pilliod Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. United States v. First National Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Mabel Elevator Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1925
  5. In re MatthewsDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API