Manzigian v. Boyajian
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
These exceptions were taken at a hearing on a motion to set aside verdicts on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The judge found that the newly discovered evidence, so far as material, was merely cumulative. We have nothing in the record that would enable us to revise this finding, if it were proper to attempt to do so.
He also held that the motion should be denied as a matter of discretion; even if the evidence were material and not cumulative.
It is plain that no exception lies to such an exercise of discretion. It cannot be held that a judge is bound as a matter of law to…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- DeLuca v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Commonwealth v. SharpeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- GrausteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Henry L. Sawyer Co. v. BoyajianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.