Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Mobile v. Aborady

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1992No. 1910464Published

1DissentMaddox, Justice

I must respectfully disagree with the holding that the amendment of the bill in this case was such “a material change in the bill as published” that it violated the provisions of § 106 of the Constitution.

The majority opinion, in my judgment, fails to follow the modern rule set out by this Court in Deputy Sheriffs Law Enforcement Association of Mobile County v. Mobile County, 590 So.2d 239, 242 (Ala.1991):

“Our examination of the older case law in this area suggests that the material variance rule was once rather strictly applied. The clear trend of our modern cases seems to be to uphold…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mayor of Ensley v. CohnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  2. Deputy Sheriffs Law Enforc. v. Mobile Cty.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Parrish v. FaulkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  4. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API