Franklin Delano Floyd v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
In this appeal from a judgment denying Appellant relief under 28 U.S. C.A. § 2255, the only issue presented is whether the District Court’s finding that Appellant was mentally competent on July 12, 1963 to waive indictment and to plead guilty to a bank robbery charge is supported by sufficient evidence. We believe that it was so supported and affirm. 1
This is the second appearance of this case here. In Floyd v. United States, 5 Cir., 1966, 365 F.2d 368, where the events, including his escape from a mental hospital and examination pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 4244, leading up to Floyd’s plea of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- James Leo Huth v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Rees v. PeytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Lewis R. Winn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Andrus v. Charlestone Stone Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Robert v. Bruce v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Rumbaugh v. ProcunierCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Rumbaugh v. ProcunierCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Robert v. Bruce v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973