Legal Opinion

Franklin Delano Floyd v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 25, 1970No. 28721_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal from a judgment denying Appellant relief under 28 U.S. C.A. § 2255, the only issue presented is whether the District Court’s finding that Appellant was mentally competent on July 12, 1963 to waive indictment and to plead guilty to a bank robbery charge is supported by sufficient evidence. We believe that it was so supported and affirm. 1

This is the second appearance of this case here. In Floyd v. United States, 5 Cir., 1966, 365 F.2d 368, where the events, including his escape from a mental hospital and examination pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 4244, leading up to Floyd’s plea of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. James Leo Huth v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Rees v. PeytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Lewis R. Winn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Andrus v. Charlestone Stone Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Robert v. Bruce v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. Rumbaugh v. ProcunierCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  4. Rumbaugh v. ProcunierCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  5. Robert v. Bruce v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API