Legal Opinion

State ex rel. McLaughlin v. Lichtenberg

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1892No. 543PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Original Application for Certiorari.

1Opinion of the Court

*232The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

— One Ruth A. McLaughlin, claiming to he the widow of Hiram C. McLaughlin, deceased, filed a petition asking for the appointment of Frank A. Pontius as administrator of his estate. The relator, the daughter of deceased, resisted said application and also filed a petition, asking for the appointment of Norman F. Haseltine as administrator. She denied that said Ruth A. McLaughlin and Hiram C: McLaughlin were ever married to each other, or that she was his widow. A hearing was had on the rights of the respective parties, upon which the court…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Robinson & Co. v. BeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Warren v. SladeMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Clayton v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
  4. Collier v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  5. People v. New York Central Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1858

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API